
If there's any player who probably didn't take steroids -- besides
Rafael Belliard -- it's probably
Cecil Fielder. He was fat, out of shape, and naturally powerful. He
joined the 50 home run club when it actually meant something -- you know, before
Brady Anderson went out there and
sullied the accomplishment with his abnormal burst in power. So Fielder came out and said baseball
could not use ignorance as a defense for allowing performance-enhancing substances to run rampant throughout the game:
"If we didn't know, we ought to really slap ourselves if we didn't think something was going on in baseball - from the commissioner's office on down," said Fielder, the manager of an independent league team. "Guys were getting too big and too strong. Little guys turned into big guys. Baseball was doing so well at the time, everybody was turning away from it and letting it go on."
Fielder was getting set to make his exit from baseball around the time that the steroids issue became most prevalent -- 1998. So it's almost safe not to lump Cecil in with that crowd. I understand where he's coming from and agree with him. I was just as suspicious as the next person when skinny slap hitters started cranking 30 homers -- believe me, it messed with my fantasy baseball draft strategy. Fielder hit 51 in 1990 -- at Tiger Stadium no less. If anyone should be taking issue with the blind eye to steroids, Fielder certainly is well within his right.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
6-25-2007 @ 2:56PM
stanfordfan said...
Brady Anderson's 50 home runs were suspicious? I'm glad somebody finally commented on that. But if he's a suspected steroids user, what about his teammate, close friend, and road roommate Cal Ripkin? After all, the primary purpose of steroids is to aid in faster recovery from strenuous workouts. What could be more important to an "iron man?" But let's face it. Ripkin is above suspicion because the press likes him.
Reply