
Mike Florio is an attorney who writes for ProFootballTalk.com and Sporting News, mostly on issues of football. Yesterday, he had an interesting legal article about the Roger Clemens
Though I have to agree with him that the Clemens case has been a text book for celebrities on how not to preserve your reputation using the legal process, I disagree with my legal colleague on how much responsibility he puts for the Clemens mess on Hardin.
We are likely going to never know the details of Rusty Hardin's advice to Roger Clemens. Such discussions are privileged.
All we can know is what we know publicly of both men.
I've met Rusty Hardin very briefly in social settings, but don't really know him. Though some dismiss him as an idiot, Hardin has a longstanding reputation for being an experienced, detail-oriented, skilled advocate who has prevailed in some very difficult cases. I cannot fathom that someone with his abilities and experience wouldn't have informed his client about the possible consequences of testifying in front of Congress or what can be revealed during a defamation suit.
What we know of Clemens is that he is a very prideful, competitive man. Someone who cares deeply about his reputation, though maybe not enough to be careful to keep out of situations that might end up looking bad.
Repeatedly, both Hardin and Clemens have publicly expressed what risk Clemens is taking in speaking the truth as Clemens sees it. As Hardin states:
"He knew every one of the potential legal risks he was running. He made the decision that he had nothing to fear in the end result, though in the short-term, there would be problems. He knew the short-term problems. This referral [to the Justice Department] is one of them. He knew about it.
"But he is absolutely insistent that he did not take steroids, he did not take human growth hormone, and it would have been hypocritical and in violation of everything he's ever believed in to act as if he did by hunkering down. Rightly or wrongly, he chose not to hunker down, but to come out publicly and defend himself."
I don't know what the truth is as it relates to Clemens. But what I can tell you from my legal experience is that it is very common for clients not to want to take responsibility for bad things that they do. That you can tell them all the bad consequences that could happen if they don't settle a lawsuit or don't take a plea, but it won't get them to budge.Strangely enough, often the most accomplished people are the ones who are the most resistant to fessing up.
Many clients would prefer to pursue a possible legal path of destruction for themselves and their families because they want to blame others instead of admit the truth. At the end of the day, they tell themselves and others that it was their lawyer who did them wrong, or they were screwed over the government, a jury, a vast conspiracy or the media--anything other than the pain of admitting fault.

And sometimes, clients are actually telling the truth and get caught up in a legal system that can brutalize the innocent.
If Clemens ever went to jail, he would go as someone who theoretically was being wronged by the system, instead of as an admitted steroid cheat. (Unless, of course, he eventually says he took steroids).
Ultimately, if you had to fire every client who didn't tell you the truth or follow your advice, you would have few clients. From Presidents to paupers, people follow self-delusional and self-destructive paths every day because they loath admitting the entire truth to themselves, their attorneys, their families and the world at large.
Actually, it seems to me that Rusty Hardin has the perfect client. Why fire a client who believes in publicly defending himself and has loads of cash?
Previously at FanHouse:
Everything Roger Clemens

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-02-2008 @ 3:51PM
Dave said...
I guess he's the perfect client if your goal as a lawyer is to be a national laughingstock
Reply
5-02-2008 @ 3:54PM
Stephanie Stradley said...
Dave-
If you choose a career of being a criminal defense attorney, you pretty much don't care about what people think of you. No matter what happens in the Clemens situation, Hardin is going to have plenty of clients.
Thanks for reading and commenting,
Steph
Reply
5-02-2008 @ 4:02PM
hampton said...
I think you're pretty much right on with your article. I'm a lawyer too and I have to believe that Rusty Hardin advised him it would almost definitely get ugly before the case was over. I'm not sure how honest Roger was with him at the beginning, however. But, maybe he was and Hardin just said, fine, I've advised you against going forward, but if you want to pay me I'll go forward and fight for you the best I can. I think Florio is assuming too many things to say that Hardin gave him bad advice.
Reply
5-03-2008 @ 9:12AM
George B Vieto said...
Roger should just walked away and not sue his former trainer for hurting Roger's reputation. But Roger decided to go for broke and his past is coming back to haunt him.
Reply
5-03-2008 @ 9:13AM
bigflyer said...
Let's see. It is Clemen's lawyers fault he is in this mess. No, it is Debbie Clemen's fault. No, it is Brian McNamee's fault. No, it is Clemen's Mother who believed in B-12 shots and told sonny boy to take them. No, it's Jose Canseco's fault who said he didn't knoe in his first book if Fat Boy Rajah took steroids. No, it is Andy Pettit's fault who "misremembered" Clemens telling him he took steroids. It is Rusty Hardin's fault who gave the $200MM arm with a five cent head bad advice.
Mo it is sen. Mithchell's fault for not telling Rajah the evidence about to be made public in his report. No it is Clemen's agent's fault for not letting him know the Mitchell Report was about to include Clemens allegations. No it is Donald Fehr's fault for not letting Clemens know Mitchell wanted to speak to the stupid arrogant fool.
It is the bartender's fault for introducing the 15 year old girl to the 28 year old family man.
I hope Fat Boy spends his millions in a failed attempt to keep his large formerly abcessed butt out of the slammer. Dumb pervert that he is.
Reply
5-03-2008 @ 9:23AM
Stephanie Stradley said...
hampton-
Been there, done that, and I didn't even get a t-shirt out of it. Agree on Roger's honesty and that it is too much to assume that Hardin didn't advise his Roger of the risk.
George-
I think that Hardin filed the defamation lawsuit because McNamee's lawyers were threatening to file suit first if Clemens went on 60 Minutes. Hardin/Clemens decided to file suit first in order to get the case in Houston instead of some other location. Filing suit before your opponent does is not unusual.
bigflyer-
Obviously, you have a strong point of view on this. I just feel sorry for all involved. Taking joy in the destroyed lives of others is bad bad bad karma.
Thanks all for reading and commenting,
Steph
Reply
5-05-2008 @ 10:59AM
Chris F. said...
I have my doubts about this "affair" that supposedly went on between Clemens and McCready. While I like Mindy, keep in mind she is attempting a comeback, but apparently if this is the route to take, then I think less of her. If she did have an affair in 1990, why are we just now hearing about it?
The media claims a lot of things from John McCain having an affair (not that I would care) to Miley Cyrus's photo "scandal". What scandal? I've seen 15 year old girls wear a lot less at the swimming pool back in the day.
Reply