
Years from now when people look back on the 79th All-Star Game, they'll remember a few things. First and foremost, they'll remember the celebration of Yankee Stadium, one of baseball's last remaining living museums, in its final season. Right alongside that, they'll think fondly of Josh Hamilton. Even if you're sick of hearing about his intense battle with drug addiction, the sight of him launching 500-foot homers into the black New York sky at the Home Run Derby won't soon be forgotten.
And perhaps after that, they'll remember the actual game itself for its record length -- 15 innings over four hours and 50 minutes. It's safe to say nobody will be thinking of the final All-Star Game at Yankee Stadium as a classic.
Part of that was the ugliness of the game. This Midsummer Classic had everything -- blown calls by the umpire, poor baserunning, way too much Aaron Cook, epic offensive squanders and even three errors by poor Dan Uggla.
But the flaws in the structure of the current incarnation of the All-Star Game were also on not-so-sparkling display. Major League Baseball still has the best showcase event in American professional sports, but it's not above a little cosmetic overhaul now and again.
With that in mind, here are four things that baseball should change to improve the All-Star Game. (There was plenty of time to come up with a list Tuesday night).
- End interleague play. The great thing about the All-Star Game used to be that it was the only chance all year to see the best of the AL and NL match up other than in the World Series. Interleague games have made the novelty of the event obsolete, and while fans in Chicago and New York might miss the intra-city rivalries, no one anywhere is going to be pining away for those classic late June Rockies-Royals series.
- Stop trying to assign artificial importance to the event. The problem with the whole "This Time It Counts" mantra is that while it might count for something, it doesn't seem to count for anything too significant. Home field advantage doesn't matter in baseball like it does in football or basketball, not to mention the fact that there doesn't seem to be much sense of urgency when the outcome of an almost completely unrelated and casual event in July determines the location of a critically important event in October.
This would also free up managers to treat the event like the exhibition it is, instead of forcing them to straddle the fence as Terry Francona did Tuesday night -- managing casually and trying to get as many players in the game as possible early on, then scrambling once the game plodded on into extra innings and he ran out of players on the bench and in the bullpen.
- Stop requiring that every team be represented at the All-Star Game. When the managers treat the game like an exhibition -- a practice that doesn't appear to be ending any time soon -- you end up with the worst players on the team playing at the end of the game. When a game goes to extra innings, that means even more unnecessary face time for the likes of Cristian Guzman. Guzman, the Nationals' lone representative and a man with a perfectly mediocre 102 OPS+, ended up getting three at-bats and playing six innings Tuesday night and into Wednesday morning. Even the fans in Washington probably would have preferred to see Jose Reyes or Pat Burrell or any of the numerous more qualified NL hitters.
- Start the game at a semi-reasonable hour. This is baseball's premier showcase event, the one day on the sports calendar it gets all to itself. By starting the game so late it excludes a key bloc of fans -- children. I'm not naive enough to think the All-Star Game should go back to the afternoon, not with the advertising dollars in primetime television, but the first pitch by Cliff Lee wasn't even thrown until after 8:45PM ET, a time when many kids are being tucked into bed. If the game started (actually really started) by 7PM, or even 8PM at the latest, young fans could still watch a few innings, with the added side benefit that they'd probably be asleep by the time Guzman got into the game.

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-16-2008 @ 11:23AM
david said...
i agree with all but one of your suggestions. The requirement that every team has a representative- is a great requirement. While you are right- seeing Jimmy Rollins is preferable than seeing Cristian Guzman for six innings for those in cities with perennial losers- having a representative on the all star team is essential. I remember in the 90's when the Twins were lousy the only reason I watched the all star game was to see ron coomer or matt lawton get an at bat. The absolute worst part of last night's game was having to hear all the rehashed info about the Yankees and Red Sox players that we get to hear over and over and over every week because those are the teams Fox shows us every blippin week. I was glad to get to see Adrian Gonzalez and Evan Longoria and Lance Berkman play because I never get to see the Padres, Rays or Astros on nationally televised games unless they happen to be playing a New York, Boston, Chicago or L.A. team...
Reply
7-16-2008 @ 12:32PM
krusecontrol said...
I have to completely disagree with your premise that this All-Star Game was *not* a "classic."
I've watched AS Games for about 20 years. By far, the most exciting one was in 1994, when Fred McGriff hit a 2-run homer in the bottom of the 9th to tie the game, and the NL won in the 10th -- with Tony Gwynn (Tony Gwynn!!!!!) churning around 3rd base (with Leyland halfway down the 3rd-base line, wildly waving him home) with the winning run, on a hit by Moises Alou.
Last night's game ranks right up there with any of the other Games in the past 20 years. It was tense all throughout -- how many times did the AL get runners in scoring position in the extra innings, before finally scoring?!! -- it had great defensive plays, plays at the plate, unexpected pitching performances, a home run in a guy's first AS at-bat ... a little of everything. I enjoyed every minute of it, even though it last until almost 1:45 a.m.
And the game also had the very unusual -- I feel farily safe in saying I doubt I'll ever see an All-Star make 3 errors in 1 game again.
In my opinion, the only thing that detracted from the game was the absolutley, downright terrible job by the broadcasting crew (easily the worst announced game I've ever watched, in any sport).
Reply
7-16-2008 @ 12:53PM
si_yam said...
VegasBigs.com FREE DAILY WINNERS
I was disapointed to see the blown calls. I think they should have Allstar calls as well added to the reqirement. Ofcourse was nice to see the NL lead untill late and in the game late, but thge bad calls that realy extended the game were anything but enjoyable.
Reply
7-16-2008 @ 5:26PM
Paul Gibson said...
Baseball is a game for the fans. Without them, there is no game. So don't even think about stopping interleague play. Growing up in Detroit, I never had a chance to see any of the National League teams except on TV. As for the All-Star game, it only provided a chance to see the best of the best, which ruled out a lot of good players.
You mention "artificial importance", but the other criticisms seem to point to an effort to improve the quality of the "All Star" game. I don't like the rule of assigning home field advantage to the winning league, and it shouldn't tie into the "All Star" game. But the event should be treated for what it is, a showcase for the best players in baseball having a good time and entertaining the fans. When push comes to shove, I don't really care who wins.
But you're right about the timing. The game should start earlier. Delay the broadcast for the "left coast". If they're fans, they'll watch.
Now, how about rule changes for the All Star game? Let players return to the game if they have been replaced earlier. That would have been a big help last night, and would negate the problem of all of the major league teams be represented.
Reply
7-16-2008 @ 7:23PM
bg said...
Limit the game to 12 innings
Reply
7-16-2008 @ 7:52PM
Fred Lescher said...
The Best Part of the 2008 All-Star Game......
A Boston Red Sox Player, JD Drew, Winning the MVP Award in Yankee Stadium!
Priceless!
Reply
7-16-2008 @ 8:27PM
DLR said...
I guess east coast bias is alive and well in Andrew Johnsons little world. Hey Andrew, there are a few of us on the west coast who would like to watch the game also. If the game is really special, I think the little ones could stay up one night during the summer to watch.
Reply
7-16-2008 @ 8:56PM
John Davis said...
The game would have been over in regulation time if the umpires would get in the proper pasition to call the play. If the home plate ump was positioned right he would have seen Navarros fut slide under the catchers shin guard before he was tagged. One play at second was also missed by the second base ump.
Reply
7-16-2008 @ 10:36PM
yes said...
Radio talk guys in Boston were excorited by the NBA when suggesting that the basketball finals start before 9:15 ish, even on a Sunday night, Good luck on that earlier All Star starting time.
Reply
7-17-2008 @ 1:38AM
George B Vieto said...
My suggestions for the AllStar Game is start the game at 7:00pm ET. Second don't play starting pitchers who played on sunday and third get rid of having a player rep from every team and finally reward the team with the best regular season record home field advantage for the World Series. In case of a tie flip a coin.
Reply
7-17-2008 @ 7:43PM
AL said...
You couldn't be any more wrong than you are. Home field advantage is more important in baseball than it is in any other sport. If you knew anything about the game then I am sure you wouldn't have made this mistake. You see when you are the home team in baseball you have the advantage of being the last team to bat, unless already ahead in the top of the ninth inning. This means that no matter what the situation the home team in guaranteed a "last chance" to redeem themselves by scoring more runs to either tie or win the game. The All-Star game decides which team will have home field advantage in the WORLD SERIES. It is no only about which fans cheer louder, which even so has a significant impact on the game as well, but who gets the better chance to win, making home field advantage in baseball much more important that football, or basketball (ew). And also, baseball is the only sport that does not have a time limit, it can be played FOREVER. No other sport can. And also, I think Aaron Cook did an awesome job on the mound picking Uggla back up for his errors, I enjoyed watching him let the American League taste victory yet quickly blow them away at the plate. One last thing, I applaud every player you knocked down, they were in that game for a reason, and I would rather watch the worst of the best play to win than the best of the best play to show-boat. Andrew Johnson, writing about sports is not your thing, learn something about the game before you trash it.
Reply
7-19-2008 @ 8:59AM
salemkv said...
So, it was a Mets "ace closer", Billy Wagner, who blew the NL lead and, ultimately, opened the floodgate that led to the AL bagging the win. All the other closers held their ground. Sounds like a familiar Mets debacle; does Willie Randolph get the blame for that?
Reply