
From the Windup is FanHouse's extended look at a particular portion of America's pastime.
The 2009 Hall of Fame ballot was released Monday, and with it is certain to come heated debate right up until and after the voting results are revealed on Jan. 12, 2009. This year's class of candidates is similar to last year's, in that it's a shallow group.
There is only one sure-fire Hall of Famer among the 23 candidates, which means this is a critical vote for the borderline players who have been up for election on multiple occasions. Now is the time for those borderline guys to get over the top or make a big push to lay the groundwork for election in future years.
After the jump is a breakdown of the ballot, complete with what I think will happen and what should happen with this year's class of Cooperstown contenders.
The Lock
Rickey Henderson: This is assuming Rickey isn't inked to a deal to by Brian Sabean this winter. Henderson is the all-time stolen bases leader. He had tremendous longevity and he might just be the greatest leadoff hitter in baseball history. He should be a unanimous choice, but won't be because of the fickle electorate, and I'm already looking forward to his acceptance speech.The Longshots
These players have virtually no chance of election: Jay Bell, Ron Gant, Jesse Orosco, Dan Plesac, Greg Vaughn, Mo Vaughn, Matt Williams.
The Contenders
Harold Baines: Despite good counting statistics, he doesn't have the magic number, the sustained stretch of sheer dominance or the defensive value to merit election.
Bert Blyleven: He shouldn't be a borderline case, but he is because of a lousy won-loss record that's mostly a function of playing on poor teams for the majority of his career. Blyleven has made significant progress toward election over the last few years, garnering nearly 62 percent of the vote last time around. He probably won't get in this year, but he'll get close, ensuring his election at some point in the near future.
David Cone: A good pitcher on some very good teams. Fun to watch. Not Cooperstown material.Andre Dawson: Like Blyleven, he's going to get in someday soon, but probably not this year. Dawson was a tremendous athlete -- one of the few players in history with 400 home runs and 300 stolen bases -- but his resume is dragged down by his poor plate discipline. His .323 career on-base percentage would be enough to keep me from voting for him.
Mark Grace: A championship-caliber player, but his best shot at making the Hall at this point is as a broadcaster.
Tommy John: Unfortunately, he doesn't get bonus points for having a revolutionary surgery named after him. A career ERA+ of 110 sinks his case.
Don Mattingly: Simply didn't enjoy a long enough career to mount a serious case.
Mark McGwire: Independent of the steroids issue, Big Mac is pretty much a slam dunk, but, of course, you can't ignore the performance-enhanced elephant in the room. McGwire isn't getting in this year after receiving only 23.6 percent of the vote in 2008, his second year on the ballot. His future prospects depend largely on how the BBWAA comes to terms with the steroids era. It's my belief that they should accept that drug use was rampant during the era and vote without regard for who used and who didn't -- after all, we'll never really know for sure -- and I have a feeling that's eventually how most of the electorate will vote, but it's going to take time.Jack Morris: He's the bizarro-Blyleven, a pitcher with a great record that's largely a function of the good teams he played on during his career. He's not going to make it this year, and with a career ERA a mere 5 percent above league average, let's hope it stays that way.
Dale Murphy: Underappreciated, but not quite Hall material.
Dave Parker: Murphy plus one season and minus the defensive value. Neither player is going to be elected.
Tim Raines: He has a snowball's chance in hell of getting elected this year, but it will be interesting to see how much progress he makes after getting a disappointing 24.3 percent of the vote in his first year on the ballot. Raines was, in many ways, a poor man's Henderson, though that's no slight against him. He was the ideal leadoff hitter -- with a .385 career on-base percentage and 808 stolen bases in 954 attempts -- and he shouldn't be punished simply because his greatness was overshadowed by Rickey's.Jim Rice: He needed only a handful more votes to make it last time around and in his final appearance on the ballot, it's expected he'll get over the top at last. Rice is one of the tougher cases in recent memory because of the shortness of both his career and his prime and because of the intangible argument often made on his behalf that he was the "most-feared" hitter in the American League -- an argument that is virtually impossible to refute because it is so nebulous. He falls just short in my estimation, but that won't matter next month.
Lee Smith: It's getting harder and harder to keep him out as other relievers are elected. Smith is a step back from Goose Gossage and much of his case rests on one number -- 478 saves. I wouldn't write in his name, but it seems like he's slowly heading toward election.
Alan Trammell: A favorite of sabermetricians, but not of the electorate, I have a hard time wrapping my head around a vote for Trammell. He was productive for a long time, but, just eyeing his career and year-by-year statistics, he doesn't have a magic number or the prolonged stretch of utter dominance that I like to see in a Hall-worthy candidate.
So there you have it. If I had a ballot, Bert Blyleven, Rickey Henderson, Mark McGwire and Tim Raines would be on it. My guess is that Henderson and Jim Rice will be elected to the Hall of Fame next month, with guys like Blyleven and Dawson making significant progress toward future election. Now let the debate begin.



















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-02-2008 @ 4:02PM
Matt Snyder said...
I agree McGwire should get in, but all the crusty voters are going to continue to "teach him a lesson."
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 4:42PM
Rob Simmel said...
What about Marvin Miller being elected to the HoF as the great former head of the MLBPA?
No non-player has ever had a bigger impact on the game of baseball than MM. The free agency and salary arbitration that today's players take for granted exist because of his leadership. A lot of people may not like the way the game has changed since the 60s, but Marvin Miller ended nearly a century in which owners abused players through the old reserve clause. The only shame is that Miller didn't come around early enough to allow all-time greats like Joe Dimaggio, Ted Williams and Willie Mays to be paid something close to what they were actually worth.
Marvin Miller deserves to be in the Hall of Fame.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 5:35PM
Cubfan786 said...
You didnt mention Ron Santo, isnt he up this year also??
Or is that the Veteran's ballot???
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 9:06PM
Matt Snyder said...
It's the veteran's committee for Ronnie. Let's hope they finally put him in.
12-02-2008 @ 5:40PM
TheHulk said...
YOU WROTE: Don Mattingly: Simply didn't enjoy a long enough career to mount a serious case.
I guess you don't think Kurby P belongs in the HOF.
There numbers are almost the same....
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 5:43PM
Dave said...
I agree with most of your conclusions. But sometimes statistics don't tell the whole story. Blyleven wasn't nearly the big-game pitcher that Jack Morris was, so if I had to chose one for HOF, it would be Morris. And I remember too well, as a Yankee hater, Mattingly's period of "utter dominance". Maybe it wasn't as prolonged a stretch as some, but it was enough to merit the Hall as much as some of the guys that piled up lesser numbers for more years.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 6:12PM
the cooker said...
Do not agree with your assessment of Mark Grace. The only reason he will not get in is he played for the Cubs. His stats bear out he was the best first baseman in the 90's, however you think Mattingly deserves to be inducted. Do not get me wrong Mattingly was an outstanding player, but so was Grace.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 7:31PM
tobrien28 said...
Miller doesn't belong in the Hall of Fame. He couldn't care less about the game, he was a money-grubbing whiner. He even whines today about how "he's stopped thinking the HOF means anything because he isn't in it". He is the reason for the loud-mouth, overpayed babies that pass as baseball players.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 7:43PM
lats said...
Agree with Dave; Morris was clutch and should be in!
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 8:46PM
Randy said...
I like Mark Magwire but with only 1686 career hits, he falls short of being a member of the HOF.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 9:40PM
jesse said...
Something that people aren't taking into account is that Mark Grace and Don Mattingly were first basemen, which is the easiest position on the field and more is expected out of the hitters.
Grace was an excellent player, but a 1B with no power is a tough sell
Mattingly was only good for 6 years, and his numbers are hurt by the fact that guys like Frank Thomas, Jeff Bagwell, etc put up superior numbers at the same 1B position.
Puckett's numbers are only slightly better than Mattingly's, but he played one of the toughest positions for most of his career, CF. Had he played only one more season his numbers would have been more than "acceptable", and he was still playing well when he suddenly couldn't play anymore. Mattingly was far removed from his last good year when he had retired (in fairness he played hurt about half his career, but then a lot of non-Hall of Famers can say that).
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 9:56PM
David said...
Why do these egotistical writers keep Mark McQwire out? This guy has been hitting homeruns from day one. There is no bonafide proof of steroid use. The andro that was in his locker was not hidden nor was it illegal. Just because a person does not care to discuss the past does not make them guilty. I'm sure some of those writers would not care to talk about their past either. He who is without sin let him cast the first stone. Whether he gets in on the next vote or the tenth vote, he still gets in. SO WHAT WAS THE POINT?
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 10:06PM
George said...
Not a Tiger fan but Jack Morris dominated in the clutch,there were more intimidating relievers in the day but no starting pitcher scared more hitters (Stewart from the A's perhaps). He was money when it counted. As fas as Puckett goes,don't think that the voters don't remember his wife-beating days. Is it worse for McGwire to take a legal drug at the time or someone that goes home and beats the crap out of his 'ol lady,it all adds up in the back of their minds.
Reply
12-02-2008 @ 10:07PM
Pat Lackey said...
For Dave Parker, I believe you meant, "Like Jim Rice, but with a drug habit."
Reply
12-03-2008 @ 1:15PM
al said...
None of these guys should get in! If a player that won back to back MVPs (Only done 7 times) and held the home run record longer than anybody isn't in the Hall of Fame why should any of these guys be in. Without Roger Maris' bust in the Hall of Fame it should be named the Hollow of Shame.
Reply
12-03-2008 @ 6:42PM
Dominick said...
Thanks for those comments about # 9. I have been a lifelong Yankee fan and my favorite all-time player was Maris. I totally agree with you, Maris should be in the Hall based on that one accomplishment, he held the HR record for over 38 years. You the man Al!
12-04-2008 @ 10:51PM
bachslunch said...
Sorry, don't agree with Dave, who said: "Blyleven wasn't nearly the big-game pitcher that Jack Morris was, so if I had to chose one for HOF, it would be Morris."
This would simply not seem to be supported by the facts. Here are the numbers for both in the postseason:
Morris: 13 G, 7-4 W-L, 3.80 ERA
Blyleven: 8 G, 5-1 W-L, 2.47 ERA
Morris may have a couple Kodak moments, but Blyleven's numbers (when he got the chance) were simply better.
Dave also said: "And I remember too well, as a Yankee hater, Mattingly's period of "utter dominance". Maybe it wasn't as prolonged a stretch as some, but it was enough to merit the Hall as much as some of the guys that piled up lesser numbers for more years."
"Maybe it wasn't as prolonged a stretch as some" is the key here. His peak was a briefly decent 6-year stretch from 1984-89 in a short 14 year career. His 10 similars contain only two HoF-ers, both very weak (Kirby Puckett, Jim Bottomley) and such Hall of the Very Good sorts as Cecil Cooper, Wally Joyner, Hal McRae, Will Clark, Jeff Conine, Tony Oliva, Keith Hernandez, and Carl Furillo. Not a good case, sorry to say. Jesse's comment re first basemen is spot on.
Reply