Once again, the Veteran's Committee shut the door on their precious Hall of Fame to anyone who played after World War II. The most blatant snub was Ron Santo. I know, I know. Time to pile on the Cubs fans and tell us why Santo didn't deserve to get in. You'll have your chance. First, I get mine. Here's why Santo should easily be in the Hall of Fame. First of all, when talking Hall of Fame, the game changes so much with the times that you have to find a comparison within the same era. That's easy here, as the gold standard at third base pre-Mike Schmidt was Brooks Robinson. Robinson and Santo played in the same era, so it's a good starting point for conversation.
I'll break down some of the more telling stats here between Santo and Robinson and decide which one has the upper hand.
Received MVP votes: Robinson -- 12 of 23 seasons. Santo -- seven of 15 seasons.
Verdict: Draw.
Gold Gloves: Robinson -- 16 of 23 seasons. Santo -- 5 of 15 seasons.
Verdict: Robinson has the upper hand, though not surprising since all you ever hear about defense at third involves his name. Still, five gold gloves isn't exactly anything to belittle.
All Star Appearances: Robinson -- 15 of 23. Santo -- 9 of 15. Santo did not make it the year he finished fourth in MVP voting -- since I wasn't alive yet I have no clue what happened there. Robinson also made at least two where his numbers were atrocious, so I have to guess name recognition helped.Verdict: Santo by a nudge, though the difference is negligible.
Career Batting Average: Santo by 10 points.
Home Runs per 162 games: Santo -- 25, Robinson -- 16. Santo had A LOT more for career despite many, many fewer at-bats.
RBI per 162: Santo -- 96, Robinson -- 76.
Runs per 162: Santo -- 82, Robinson -- 69.
Career OPS: Santo -- .826, Robinson -- .723.
Career Fielding Percentage: Robinson -- .971, Santo -- .954.
I really think Santo's case is better, until you throw in Robinson's MVP (Santo never finished higher than fourth, though he was in the top eight four times) and two World Championship rings. So, depending upon how much stock you put into any of the numbers above or team achievements, the guys are fairly even. Just for argument's sake, I don't think this greatly separates them. Juan Gonzalez has two MVPs and David Eckstein has two rings, for example. Then you stumble along the true separation point: longevity. Robinson's prime, judging from the stats, looks like about 19-20 years, while Santo's was around 11.
There are a handful of guys in the Hall with worse credentials. Seriously, was Red Schoendienst really better than Santo? And if we're really keeping him out because of longevity issues, why are Ryne Sandberg, Kirby Puckett, and Ralph Kiner in?
Furthermore, there are only 10 third basemen in the Hall of Fame. This game has been played for far too long to only have witnessed 10 all-time greats at the hot corner. I also don't understand the discrepancy. You saw the numbers above. Was the difference between Santo and Robinson really wide enough to have one never make the Hall of Fame while the other was overwhelmingly voted in as a first-ballot inductee?
If writers are going to build a wall between the Hall and guys like Mark McGwire, Barry Bonds, and Roger Clemens for personal reasons, shouldn't some concessions be given to a man who played through the same diabetes which has now claimed both of his legs? This was obviously the reason for his shortened career, and longevity seems to be the one reason he's not making it.
Santo deserves to be individually glorified. As I said, he has no legs now. He claims that a Cubs World Series win would be more gratifying than seeing himself inducted into the Hall. I believe him. I understand the game is played between the lines and off the field stuff shouldn't matter -- though the baseball Hall does ask people to judge the entire character of the player -- but there are some train wrecks for human beings bumping around this game. Santo is a good, genuine man who played baseball, from what the stats tell me (man, I wish I could have seen him), like an absolute stud for about 10 years. Maybe another three years would have been enough for the veterans committee. They meet again in two years, so let's hope that someone shakes some sense into them within that time span. I hope he makes it, because Ronnie may not be alive come time for the next vote. And he will die having never seen a Cubs championship -- seriously, what are the odds? -- and never having been elected in the Baseball Hall of Fame. I always find it funny when people like Skip Bayless spew the "Hall of the Very Good," crap. Very good isn't on the same medium as Fame. It's not called the Hall of Elite Players. It's the Hall of Fame. Ron Santo is plenty famous, and he is a significant enough part of baseball history to be enshrined. The veteran's committee should be ashamed of themselves. This was -- for the billionth straight time with Santo -- a terrible decision in terms of on-field and off-field accomplishments.
It's not altogether surprising, though, because living Hall of Famers comprise the Veteran's Committee. If they start electing more people into their little elitist club, it could become saturated and they won't get as much credit for being there. What a pathetic way to cling to individual legacy.*
*obviously this is directed at the 40 percent of the members who didn't vote for Santo. I'm good with the 60 percent who did the right thing.

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
12-08-2008 @ 5:18PM
Donut King said...
It's becoming quite obvious that the Hall of Fame voters, no matter what committee it may be, will not allow the deserving likes of Ron Santo (and Ted Simmons . . . and Bert Blyleven) into the HoF.
It's enough to make a common man punch a fist through a wall. I won't be the one doing the striking, though.
Reply
12-08-2008 @ 5:40PM
Michael said...
3 teammates of his are already in. How can you have 4 hall of famers on a team that hasn't one a damn thing?
Reply
12-10-2008 @ 10:55AM
Bobby Davis said...
Well, those three are Ernie Banks, Billy Williams, and Ferguson Jenkins, all in the elite of their time, and none of whose fault was the utter ineptitude of the management of the Cubs team--at a time before free agency. Santo was the elite third baseman of his time defensively in the NL--led in putouts and assists every year, and a stud power hitter in a pitcher-dominant era. It's ridiculous he's not in. And I'm a Mets fan.
12-08-2008 @ 5:50PM
the cooker said...
Matt, you missed a lot if you did not see Santo play ball. He was a master at the backhand stab behind third base and a rocket throw to first base. Santo at third and Ernie Banks at short was a thrill for me to watch daily growing up on WGN.
Reply
12-08-2008 @ 7:39PM
Bob S said...
Orlando Cepeda sells dope to Puerto Rican kids, goes to jail as a result, & he gets voted into HofF while Gil Hodges with equal stats at 1B as Cepeda gets ignored along with Ron Santo.
Reply
12-08-2008 @ 7:25PM
gary33 said...
Brooks Robinson hit 28 homeruns during the 1964 season. he also won the American League mvp that season. I agree Ron Santos deserves to be in the hof but at least get the facts right.
Reply
12-08-2008 @ 7:29PM
Matt Snyder said...
I never said anything about Robinson's 1964 HR total, and I did mention that he won an MVP.
I have all my facts straight.
Go up and check the numbers I explicitly wrote if you wish. You won't find a mistake there, because I did the research today.
12-08-2008 @ 8:50PM
gary33 said...
The most homeruns Brooks Robinson hit during one season 1964 (162 games) was 28 not the 16 homeruns that you misrepresented from above. That fact is 100% wrong.
12-08-2008 @ 8:52PM
Matt Snyder said...
Home Runs per 162 games is an average. Not a career high. If I was using career highs Santo would easily trump Robinson since he hit more than 28 home runs FIVE times.
12-08-2008 @ 9:34PM
Ron Fan said...
Obviously Matt is giving averages per 162 games during each players career. So Robinson averaged 16 per 162 games, can you agree with that?
12-09-2008 @ 12:01AM
jeff l said...
He has the statistics but all that heel clickin' was bush. Also, Ronny was not a very pleasant guy to be around from what I have been told. However, his statistics are good enough. Alot of these guys especially guys like Don Sutton who never even won 20 games want to keep others out. I am okay with him being in now. But I doubt if it will happen. Ron has tried also pity himself into the hall by campaigning all these years on the airwaves.
It's a bit maudlin. It definitely a mixed bag with him.
Reply
12-09-2008 @ 8:54AM
Tim said...
At least you don't see guys like Bert Blyleven campaigning for themselves. The only thing Ron Santo talks about is how he deserves to be in the HOF. The years of self-gratification over the airwaves has finally caught up to him. Maybe there should be another crap movie created for his campaign.
Reply
12-09-2008 @ 4:42PM
cd said...
Come on . No one will get in under the current format. The 63 living members of the hall were allowed to vote for 4 players from the list and they avg. 3.6 votes. So it is not like they did not want to vote someone in . They simply voted for the players that they played with/against that they seemen worthly. In a quick count i counted 35 members out of the 64 that never were on the field with santo. So getting 75%of the vote is next to inpossible. They must make a committee of lets say 20 guys that ACTUALLY played with/against the players in question.What the hell does Wade Boggs know about Santo or Gary carter know about Luis Tiant. The system is flawed unless that was the aim.
Reply
12-10-2008 @ 3:59PM
jack runyan said...
through all the positives and negitives about santos worth in regards to be in the hall of fame or not in my book he was and still is my hero,and i would love to see him get in!
Reply
12-10-2008 @ 5:28PM
Mike said...
Santo was very critical of other ballplayers at times during his career, and some of those players are the ones that have votes for the HOF now. Santo deserves to be in because of his stats, but because of his criticisms, he may never get in.
Reply
12-10-2008 @ 10:25PM
Gary said...
Hi, Matt:
I had to write and say I'd seen Ronnie play a game of baseball about 25-30 times in person! I live in Jersey, so a trip to North Philly (up to 1970) or South Philly (1971-1973) was quite do-able. IN addition, I turned my dad on to Ron's greatness, and well, I hadn't started driving until 1970 or so...Ron was magnificent, Matt...once on the Saturday afternoon "Game of the Week," someone hit a groundball to Santo at thirdbase. It was the kind of ball an infielder dreads...high bounding, hard hit....it could take your head off! Ron faced it like a man, like a guy trying to stare down a wild cat. Coming in slightly for it rather than allowing it to play him, that hard hit high bounding shot DIED in Ron's glove. He short-hopped it and then, with his rifle arm, threw to Enie Banks at first for the out. Just a tremendous play. And speaking of Philadelphia, go look up the shot that Ron Santo hit at Connie Mack Stadium on the Sunday that we went to the moon, because Ron Santo got there first with a rocket shot over the center field pavilion! He was just a great ballplayer, a good, patient hitter who'd walk 90 times a year, a hustler, a fiery gamer. I am totally unhappy Ron was dissed by the Hall of Fame but let's not dwell on it...except, if nine George Kell's (yes, a Hall of Famer) played a series of seven games against nine Ron Santo's, I'd be surprised if the nine Ron Santo's would need a sixth game to turn back the Kells.
Reply
12-11-2008 @ 1:35PM
Yohncc said...
I agree and (actually thought by now) that Ron Santos should be in the Hall of Fame (as well as Gil Hodges). It's an outrage to me that Don Sutton (a Cheater) and Ferguson Jenkins (a drug user) are in there. I don't know whether George Kell should be in as a player (if he in fact is), however his broadcasting abilities were superb for many years. Picking on this lengend no matter how frustrated with the process you may be will not help get Ron Santos any closer to the Hall of Fame.
Reply
12-12-2008 @ 3:54PM
chaim said...
the worst snub is to gil hodges who could play any position
and not only was a feared power hitter for a decade-he was a gold glove winner and the manager of the miracle mets of 69.
he was a man of exceptional character who was loved by all including the yankees' yogi berra. yogi said that his one regret at the time he was voted in was that gil wasn't there to be with him!
Reply
12-13-2008 @ 6:18PM
Tom Anderson said...
Ron Santo was my hero growing up, but not for playing baseball. Like Ron, my younger sister was diabetic. She attended a summer camp for diabetics that Ron took time to visit to talk to the kids about living with diabetes. His attitude toward not allowing his illness effect his life changed my sister's life. Regardless of if Ron ever makes it into the Hall of Fame, I will never forget this selfless contribution in helping young children know that they can still reach for the stars even if they are afflicted with juvenile diabetes. Keep the faith Ron, one day maybe the Hall of Fame will recognize your greatness.
Reply
12-15-2008 @ 8:44PM
bachslunch said...
Gil Hodges unfortunately doesn't have a very good HoF argument. His 10 most similar players include no HoF-ers: Norm Cash, George Foster, Tino Martinez, Jack Clark, Boog Powell, Rocky Colavito, Lee May, Joe Adcock, Willie Horton, and Roy Sievers. All nice Hall of the Very Good types, but no one sufficiently deserving.
Ron Santo, however, does. Of his 10 similars, four are HoF-ers (they are marked with an asterisk): Dale Murphy, Ken Boyer, Gary Gaetti, *Yogi Berra, *Gary Carter, *Johnny Bench, Ruben Sierra, Chili Davis, *Carlton Fisk, Bobby Bonilla. I actually don't blame Santo for thinking he belongs in the HoF, because he does. It may be perceived as bad form to talk in your own favor, though.
And in bringing up Brooks Robinson: Rusty Staub, Buddy Bell, *Robin Yount, Ted Simmons, Vada Pinson, Steve Finley, Gary Gaetti, Julio Franco, Al Oliver, and Brian Downing are his 10 similars. Only one HoF-er here, with Simmons and Oliver arguably also worthy but not in.
The one guy they did vote in, Joe Gordon, also has no HoF similars and isn't a very good choice either. And luckily Allie Reynolds, also very much not deserving, missed by one vote. Meanwhile, they snubbed much better choices such as Jim Kaat, Bill Dahlen, Vern Stephens, Joe Torre, Deacon White, Al Oliver, and Santo.
These are of course the same morons who think Bowie Kuhn belongs in. Totally ridiculous. They need to revamp this system badly.
Reply