As baseball's offseason slogs along at a molasses-like pace, the Jake Peavy-to-Cubs rumors just won't die. Whether it's actual reality or just pure conjecture at this point is hard to tell. For now, Peavy and each front office remain pretty quiet. And all we're left doing is speculating.
Yet we do know a few things that still make the deal a logical one.
The Cubs recently traded for Garrett Olson, a pitcher the Cubs have never cared for in past trade talks. Why now? Well, you could speculate it's because the Padres pined for him during the Winter Meetings, when the Orioles were a possible third-team in the proposed deal.
The Cubs also stockpiled young arms when trading Mark DeRosa. While they didn't necessarily garner prospects who would be attractive to the Padres, they could be adding organizational depth in anticipation of parting with two or three of their own young pitchers.
With the departure of Jason Marquis, there seems to be one open rotation spot. Sean Marshall could certainly enter the season as the Cubs' fifth starter, but that would be in contradiction to the plans that general manager Jim Hendry, manager Lou Pinella and pitching coach Larry Rothschild have in place for protecting their rotation from injury. Marshall was already slated to garner upwards of 15 starts, as the Cubs planned on limiting Rich Harden to 25 starts, while also having Marshall occasionally fill in for Carlos Zambrano.
On the Padres' end, they figure to be about $5 million over the desired payroll for 2008. Peavy will make $11 million this season, so trading him for several younger players would likely reach the goal of $40 million for the 2008 season.
Adding Olson, Kevin Hart, and Rich Hill would give the Padres some cheap starting pitching options. Hill will be 29 this season, but he showed flashes of what he could do in 2007. He's since run out of favor with Pinella and he's now out of minor league options. Moving into a pitcher's park like Petco would really benefit Hill, so his inclusion would make sense, as long as the Padres are willing to take him.
Josh Vitters is a top-notch third-base prospect -- still a few years away from the bigs -- who is coveted by the Padres. Ronny Cedeno fills an immediate need at shortstop, unless you believe the aging, untalented David Eckstein is a starter. Even if you do, Cedeno plays a better short than Eckstein, who could easily slide over to second base. The Cubs recently reached terms with Cedeno, but he seems pretty redundant on their roster, considering they already have Mike Fontenot, Ryan Theriot, and Aaron Miles as middle infielders. He's also out of options.
Now, of course, there is one gigantic holdup. The absurdly long process of deciding upon new ownership in Chicago is still dragging along. Depending upon where you look, the process will end Wednesday, by the end of the week, by the end of the month, or by Opening Day. The Cubs cannot take on Peavy's salary until a new owner is named and approves the additional payroll.
And so the waiting continues.

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-20-2009 @ 6:05PM
Thomas Semesky said...
It would be nice to have Jake Peavy as a Cub, but not at the expense of giving away too much young talent.
Reply
1-26-2009 @ 11:00AM
whats up big man said...
I say, do whatever you got to do to give up peavy...the rotation would be SICK, if we got him. If we have to give up a bunch of young talent, then so be it...history has proven that our young talent hasn't exactly been lighting the stage up...except for Geovany Soto..we got rid of Felix Pie cuz he couldn't do anything. we were so high on corey patterson, and he still sucks...Peavy is young, and why not?? got to make sacrifices to put together a championship team...the only thing i still disagree with is the Soriano batting leadoff..strikes out WAY too much, and what good does his speed do when he isn't on base?? that should be theriot's spot cuz at least he proves that he can make contact.
1-20-2009 @ 8:36PM
irongorillaz said...
I agree, Peavy would make the Cubs starting rotation one of the scrariest out there for opposing offenses. With that said, giving away to much for that option might hurt our future in the long run. But, being a diehard Cub fan and this whole losing streak mumbo jumbo, the time is NOW! Get er' done Jim! Get er' done!!!!!
Reply
1-22-2009 @ 1:07AM
John said...
Padres are moving to AAA. They'll be lucky to win there.
Reply
1-23-2009 @ 5:22PM
georgechgo8 said...
are the cubs nuts why are they looking to sign peavy.if they are the only club looking at him i think it's a red flag that he might be HURT.well quess it wont be the first time our illustriest sport teams waste big money on injured players.
Reply
1-26-2009 @ 12:49AM
cubbyfanatic said...
We are trading for Jake Peavy, not signing him. He is not Hurt!!!! We will get him.
Jim Hendry,
GM of the cChicago Cubs
1-26-2009 @ 11:08AM
whats up big man said...
the cubs should do what it takes to get peavy, no question. the only reason another team hasn't tried to go after him is because of the money situation, but jim wants him bad. the only thing clouding my mind about the cubs team is the whole Soriano batting leadoff...I just don't get that..He strikes out way too much, and his plate discipline is horrific. Why can't somebody else have a shot at leadoff??? Theriot batted leadoff while Soriano was hurt, and did just fine...Piniella is really ignorant in thinking that Soriano is a good fit for the leadoff hole...He could drive in over 120 runs if you put him in the 5th hole behind Ramirez...When you have a guy that fans as much as Soriano does, its stupid to have him leading off. Thats just my opinion. I feel that a leadoff should be the guy with the most speed, and best plate discipline on your team..and able to draw walks...Soriano doesn't fit any of those. If they put Theriot in the leadoff spot, then imagine the 3,4,5 and 6 we would have. Lee, Ramirez, Soriano, Bradley. maybe not in that order. Im sure somebody would tell me that, well, the cubs won 97 games with soriano batting leadoff..yeah, true, but what happened in the playoffs again???? OH..THATS RIGHT..SORIANO COULDN'T DO SHIT...
Reply