Next Big Thing is MLB FanHouse's look at emerging teams, trends and stars in 2009.One of the most surprising free-agent signings in the winter before the 2008 season was Jose Guillen. The Royals laid out $36 million over three years for the outfielder, a big sum for a team operating on a small budget.
There wasn't much in Guillen's history to justify such a large outlay of cash and he didn't change any minds with a poor 2008 season that helped the Royals to another second division finish. It was a move that didn't make sense when it happened and looks no better upon further review.
It's looking like this year's version is going to be Raul Ibanez. Based on the way the market has played out, it's pretty obvious that the Phillies jumped the gun by signing Ibanez for more than $10 million a year. The Phillies may not be the Royals when it comes to budgetary matters, but they did have payroll concerns thanks to the slew of arbitration eligible players this offseason. The last thing you want to do in that spot is overpay for production you could have gotten for cheaper.
The Phillies did just that. Entering the offseason there were five notable corner outfielders entering free agency. Ibanez, Bobby Abreu, Milton Bradley, Adam Dunn and the Phillies' own Pat Burrell. Four of the five are awful defenders and Bradley is constantly injured, but all of them can bring thunder with the bat. The glut of similar players meant that it was a buyer's market, especially with salaries already depressed because of the overall economic climate.
The Phillies moved first and snapped up Ibanez, then watched as Bradley and Burrell signed for less money. Burrell is especially painful as he was a key member of a World Series team and signed with Tampa for almost $3 million less per season than Ibanez got from the Phillies. Bradley will be making nearly as much money for the same amount of time, but he's six years younger than Ibanez.
Ibanez is a better player than Guillen, but there's nothing about him that demanded such an aggressive move by the Phillies. It's one thing for the Yankees to outbid the planet for CC Sabathia and Mark Teixeira. They can afford it and the players justify the boldness of the move, but Ibanez was an ordinary player in this market. Just as the Guillen move came out of nowhere, so did the Phillies' choice to go into business with Ibanez.
When Abreu and Dunn find new homes, the deal will likely look even worse. Ibanez should be more productive than Guillen was for the Royals, but he'll have to be better than all of the other four players the Phillies could have signed to stop this deal from being a massive mistake.

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-28-2009 @ 5:48PM
dvstckwll said...
Ibanez better the Guillen? Not hardly. You were right the first time they are virtually identical with Ibanez being the more consistent while Guillen when hot can carry a club, yes, even the Royals, for weeks at a time.
Reply
1-28-2009 @ 7:08PM
dsjr said...
I think it'a a bad comparison. The Royals have been cellar dwellers for at least a decade and a half. The Phillies are WORLD CHAMPIONS and have been competitive for several years. It is an insult to the Phillies organization to be compared to an organization that obviously does not care about winning. What have all the "great" free agent signings the NY Mets have aquired gotten them? They have just watched the WORLD CHAMPION PHILLIES blow past them in September. Sounds like the writer is a Met fan to me.
Reply
1-28-2009 @ 8:06PM
Tony Frisa said...
Yea Ibanez is a solid player, but DEFINITELY not worth $10m per year. That kind of money gets you upper echelon players, even nowadays. I would probably not be going out on a limb by saying that the larger appeal of Ibanez over Burrell was the fact that the Mets openly coveted Ibanez for the last two years. Had the Phillies not signed him the Mets would have been a strong candidate to get him. So how much of this contract is based on quality of the player versus getting one over on the Mets. Given that the Mets got Putz and Rodriguez the Phillies needed to make some kind of a splash. Solid player, not worth $10m and possibly signed for at least partially the wrong reasons.
Reply
1-29-2009 @ 8:31AM
ringtowndodger said...
I believe hitting in the Phils lineup will give Ibanez better pitches to hit. He is a good defensive player. Remember the Phils offered Burrel more money than he signed for and he turned it down.
Reply
2-03-2009 @ 8:59AM
Dale said...
Oh Tony, still disgruntled that those mets choked again...and your comment of 10 million..guess you haven't seen what other clubs are paying for players uh???The yankees and boston both try to buy the ring every year...What baseball needs is a salary cap..then see how many rings boston or new york would get..then they would have to delevop players instead of buying them
Reply