Marvin Miller, the iconic former head of the Major League Baseball Players Association, hurled some serious invective at Major League Baseball, the federal government, current union leadership and the media for their roles in what he termed a "witch hunt" aimed at professional athletes. Miller defended the union's decision not to destroy the 2003 urine test results that resulted in Alex Rodriguez's outing as a steroid user, but, during an interview with ESPN.com, said that he would never have allowed the tests to be done in the first place.
"There's no evidence that's plausible to justify testing people indiscriminately. If the government wanted to do that, they'd have to go to court for each player tested and say, 'Here's evidence of probable cause that this player is a user of an illegal product.' "Miller was just getting warmed up.
He accused the media of perpetuating steroid use among kids by calling them "performance enhancers." In his estimation, that indicates that one need do nothing more than use steroids to become the next Barry Bonds or Roger Clemens, which comes off as both a massive oversimplification and an insightful point about the role the media has played in stoking the steroid era.
Of course, Miller also believes that there's no such thing as a performance-enhancing drug in the first place. Players believe that they enhance performance, so they take them, but Miller doesn't buy the notion that they actually help anything. Unsurprisingly, he doesn't believe that they pose a health risk, either, and calls the government hypocritical for criminalizing them while keeping tobacco legal.
It is hard to think of anything more hypocritical than the way the government criminalizes some substances while keeping tobacco and alcohol legal. That's not going to bring anyone around to Miller's way of thinking, however. He comes across as the old-school union man that he is, born in a time when employees were far more taken advantage of than they are today.
The current MLBPA is partners with MLB in a way that didn't exist when Miller was running the show. Whatever the scientific facts of steroid use, they are perceived as being bad for the body and unfair for the game. It is firmly in the best interests of both sides to make sure the game is seen as clean by the consumers who are filling their wallets. The individual rights of the players, in this case, have become less important than the collective good, a point of view Miller wouldn't be caught dead espousing.

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-10-2009 @ 9:23PM
Martin said...
This shows the stupidity of the persons running the players' union. The players' union (which should have as its primary goal the safety of its members) protected the guilty at the expense of the innocent, all the while knowing the harmful effects that steroids cause. The players union stonewalled the owners who tried to institute testing for many years. What other union would promote an activity that physically harms its members. That is the biggest travesty in this whole situation.
Reply
2-10-2009 @ 11:09PM
mnlmiller1 said...
why is it ok for the NFL to have steroids in there
league they all look like they can bench press BUICKS?
Reply
2-11-2009 @ 3:52PM
thegooddoctor said...
agree with Marvin Miller. this steroid story is nothing more than a witch hunt by a bunch of self righteous, moralist, who want be seen as more important to sports than the people who play. Sport writers, commentators, pundits and others want to hang around the players to make them selves feel like they are adding some thing to the game, like that know more about the game than the people who watch the game, by writing about things that has nothing to do with playing the game. By writing the same dis information over and over, and saying the same bias comments they are want the public to believe that this is how you are think. What is a performance enhancing drug? Does gatoraid enhance your performance. Where are all the deaths and medical problems from all this steroid use in sports. I know about all the deaths and medical problem caused by tobacco and alcohol. And where are the stories about the players who used performance enhancing drugs who's performance wasn't enhanced. To state that the rights of the players or less important than the collective good is equivalent to saying you're guilty because we say so and we don't need a trial.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reply
2-11-2009 @ 5:11PM
bsc728 said...
This is the equivalent of the police busting in without a warrant. In any court the evident would be inadmissible but in the case of public opinion.. That being say I think hes full of it when he says he stopped in 03, this story has some context about how little alex's dates don't quite add up.
http://www.newsy.com/videos/i_was_stupid_a_rod_media_and_drugs/
Reply