Because of the many factors involved in a possible trade of Roy Halladay, it's "50-50 they trade him, maybe less," a person familiar with the Blue Jays front office told FanHouse.Toronto general manager J.P. Ricciardi has said he will listen to offers for Halladay, his ace right-hander. But because Halladay is signed through 2010, any trade partner must have a deep farm system, the payroll flexibility to afford Halladay and expectations to contend this year and next.
Another source familiar with the issue said he believed the "Phillies are the leaders at this point."
Philadelphia has been searching for a front-end starter for most of the season, and pairing Halladay with Cole Hamels atop the rotation to go with the potent Phils offense could make them the NL favorites.
A scout who has seen the Phillies' system said they have the players to land Halladay "if they wanted to," adding that they have "plenty of bullets" in the minors. But it would take quite a package to land Halladay, who since the start of the 2006 season is tops in the league in wins, winning percentage and complete games, is second in innings pitched (one fewer than CC Sabathia) and strikeout/walk ratio and is third in ERA.
"I don't think J.P. is in a hurry to trade him," the first source said.
"If people want the guy, [the Jays] want your best guys. ... You're going to have to ante up. At the end of the day, we'll see who puts up or shuts up."
The source said "it's almost got to be like a [Erik] Bedard deal [or] Dan Haren."
That means at least a couple of young players who are ready for the majors. And if Toronto is building for the longer term, it would be looking for a shortstop, third baseman and pitching.
Seattle gave up outfielder Adam Jones, reliever George Sherrill and pitching prospects Chris Tillman, Tony Butler and Kam Mickolio for Bedard. Arizona traded outfielders Carlos Gonzalez and Aaron Cunningham, infielder Chris Carter, and lefties Brett Anderson, Dana Eveland and Greg Smith to Oakland for Haren.
Further complicating the matter is the contract status of Halladay, 32. He hasn't said whether he would require a contract extension to waive his full no-trade clause – and a team that gives up a lot for him might want to sign Halladay to an extension. Either would require a negotiating window once the trade is in place.
"I want to stay, but I think it's a situation you have to evaluate," Halladay said before Tuesday night's game against Tampa Bay. "I'm really not at that situation just yet. If something does come up, you weigh your options at that point. I hate to put the cart in front of the horse and start saying 'Do I want to do that? I think you just evaluate the situations when they come."Toronto, too, could decide it has a chance to contend in 2010 -- with the nucleus of a decent offense in place and pitching help coming from the disabled list -- and thus keep Halladay.
The source used the analogy of selling a house to explain Ricciardi's approach to trading Halladay.
"J.P. has a house," he said. "He doesn't need one. But if there's a great deal, and someone offers him a $1 million house for $200,000, he'll try that.
"I think a lot has to go right and fit for this to happen."

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-08-2009 @ 12:29PM
Jon Anderson said...
This trade would be HUGE. The Phils would have to give up a huge package to get Halladay... I don't think it'll go through.
Reply
7-08-2009 @ 3:02PM
billyp01 said...
they would prob have to give up happ AND drabek to get halladay.. our pitching future for very possibly back to back titles? tough call
Reply
7-08-2009 @ 5:04PM
chilly16 said...
Can we please get another respectable pitcher??
Reply
7-08-2009 @ 10:18PM
Dave said...
Go Yanks!!!!
Reply
7-08-2009 @ 11:48PM
shanegradyf26 said...
Phillies should get him but if the costs will damage the future of the franchise. It'll be a close one. But having to give up two prospects is hard.
Reply
7-09-2009 @ 12:41PM
papam11 said...
Would the Sox give up Bucholtz, Anderson and Kelly for Halladay? I would, but only if he would sign a 3 year extention--although I'm not thrilled with his delivery. The Sox have "dicked" around with Clay B. and my bet is that he has a sour attitude about how the Sox have handled him these past couple of years. He was doing well until they played "tinkeritis" with his delivery. I know I'd be PISSED and probably would have demanded a trade by now. No right to demand a trade, some say? He can do anything he wants. He's 7-1 and blowing everyone away in AAA, while the Sox seem to have a big problem getting starters past the 6th inning. The Sox are in NEED. No SS, Ortiz is done, Bay is sliding, Varitek sucks, Lowell is hurt, Drew can't quite seem to get the bat off of his shoulder most of the time and Pedroia is certainly not MVP quality this year. I smell a blockbuster.
Reply
7-11-2009 @ 11:38AM
atar said...
....and they are in first place in the AL.
7-09-2009 @ 4:14PM
Mark said...
I cant see him going to another AL east team. To me that would be management telling their fans and players we're giving up. Why would you want this guy pitching against you? If he gets traded (and I dont think it will happen) I'll guess he goes to the Phillies or Rockies
Reply
7-15-2009 @ 7:57PM
bob said...
please dont trade him...i know management is not reading this, but please dont trade doc. I mean you might get some prospects, but ur trading away the best pitcher in the baseball (i dont care what you say johan has been slipping and haren and lincecum pitch in shitty divisions). We have a ton of young good pitchers who just happen to be on the DL. Marcum and Mcgowen were doing great their first years as starters, and you put Romero who is an aboslute stud with them and doc, and you got 1 hell of a starting rotation anchored and coached by the best in the game. We got young hitters too, all signed past 2010 (hill, wells, rios, travis snider, lind) and all are all star caliber...rios, wells, and hill have already been there and lind was as deserving as anyone this year. Snider is young but no one doubts the kid is going to be stud.
That said, what would we get in a deal? we have a good young starting rotation, and good young hitters. all that would happen is that we would lose a class act, a fan favorite, and team leader in exchange for kids who would change the nucleus of the team, and make wells and rios team leaders when they clearly are not ready.
Of all of your stupid decisions since being GM JP, this would be by far your dumbest.
Reply