Normally, this wouldn't really be newsworthy, considering the owner and his wife splitting up is more a personal matter than a business one. This isn't normal, though. Jamie was the team's CEO -- at least until Frank fired her a week ago, after they were already separated. Jamie is also trying to claim she is part owner of the team, which would technically mean Frank couldn't have fired her.
Most recently, Frank filed papers opposing his wife's demand to be reinstated as the team's chief executive, claiming she had an affair with her bodyguard, Jeff Fuller. Allegedly, Jamie took a trip in early July to Israel on team business, but then headed to France for 2 1/2 weeks and billed the Dodgers for the trip. Frank claims that before his wife went on the trip she asked for Fuller to be her driver.
There was also a 911 call made by Jamie McCourt in early September, but there are conflicting stories as to what actually happened. Frank McCourt's lawyer, Michael Grossman, claimed that the 911 call Jamie made was phony. According to the police report that was filed, Frank came over to the house while she was swimming, which prompted her to make the call.
Here's the rest of the drama, and where things currently stand:
• Jamie has filed for divorce and is requesting that she be reinstated as CEO of the Dodgers. She is seeking $320,967 per month in spousal support, but $487,634 if she's not reinstated at her old post. She claims she needs this much money for living expenses -- which Frank allegedly hasn't been paying since July -- and to pay her attorneys. Her point is that the divorce will be a lengthy, complicated and expensive process. Frank has unlimited funds, she says, considering the couple is worth over $1.2 billion and has an estimated cash flow of more than $10 million per year."I do not believe it is appropriate that I should be required to invade our savings to pay my living expenses and the costs of this divorce action while Frank receives (or has access to) millions of dollars in distributions perquisites and benefits from the various Dodger related entities and other companies."• Frank claims he's the sole owner of the Dodgers, Jamie claims they both own the Dodgers -- a team worth an estimated $800 million. Frank's name is listed as the owner with Major League Baseball, but rules require only one person be named as the "controlling person." Jamie's argument is that she was just as much a part of the ownership group as Frank. She has been the highest ranking female in baseball since 2005.
• Jamie believes that her firing was part of a "calculated plan to try and humiliate and ostracize" her by her soon-to-be-ex-husband.
• She is also seeking to have a laundry list of "privileges" reinstated, such as: private jet travel, five-star hotel accommodations, use of the owners' suite at Dodger Stadium, Blackberry charges, flowers for her office, country club dues and possession of two of the couple's nine properties.
• The attorneys working the case are expecting to ring up a bill of over $2 million.
There are so many layers to this that it's going to be a long offseason for the team who fell one step short of the World Series.

















Reader Comments (Page 1 of 6)
10-29-2009 @ 6:57AM
Lllmmmccc42 said...
Private jets?..flowers for the office?..country club dues paid? Blackberry charges paid?.This is yet another reason fans are paying rediculous money for tickets. Team owners are no better than COs of the auto industry
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 7:41AM
maashla said...
There is a solution. Don't buy tickets and don't watch. If you do so you are just feeding into this ridiculous way of life.
10-29-2009 @ 10:52AM
raybass said...
Years ago I lived in Baltmore, I went of many oriole games. Took my two sons, and daughter to the game, for the four of us and crab cackes for each of us cost $12. Today I could not afford to even get one ticket. OK inflation. too many teams that make the game watered down. Give me the old days.
10-29-2009 @ 11:14AM
Martin said...
The responder above is only partially correct. Every time you buy a soda, shoes or any product endorsed by an athlete or in a tv commercial during the sporting event, you are, in a sense paying for the sport. Watch it, read about it, etc....just don't directly pay for it. Don't buy the team jersey, tickets etc...that's how you hit them in the pocket book. Enjoy it without paying the premium.
10-29-2009 @ 12:03PM
John said...
They're alot better...they make money..your just jealous
10-29-2009 @ 12:11PM
budmar1997 said...
As much as I love some sprots....you are right All (except some who dont take more that a reasonable % of employees wages) CEO are some of the problems with this area. Its a shame Money Greed and Power thats what its all about.
10-29-2009 @ 7:13AM
pistolpete58 said...
who cares about this divorce , worry about real problems like loss of jobs ,inflation. health care and the senior citizen population getting forgotten about .
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 1:22PM
Colleen said...
Everyone is missing the point!!! She cheated on him, she did not live up to her word "till death do us part." I believe she should get nothing!! Why reward someone who is cheating...what a good set up! That's whats wrong with this world, no morals any more.How about starting by going to CHURCH!!Someday every knee will bow, I would rather do it on my own. Jesus is the answer!
10-29-2009 @ 7:18AM
tradal said...
i swear to god... what is wrong with people... if she is a legit adultress just brand a huge "A" in her chest and be done with it.
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 7:42AM
maashla said...
Remember it is O.K. for men but not for women. We are not supposed to be sexual beings just sex slaves.
10-29-2009 @ 11:07AM
Martin said...
The reponse that it is okay for men and not women and justification that women are sexual beings too is LAME. Using that flow of logic then, decades ago a cheating husband would loose everything, therefore she loses everything now.
If a person is unhappily married, divorce BEFORE you find another lover.
10-29-2009 @ 7:50AM
Lisa Marie said...
These people have problems? Really?...They're Gross!...no sympathy here!
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 7:56AM
cambier lingua said...
She's a skank. She had everything - a great job, a faithful and fair husband who gave all of this to her regardless of her "office" held. She didn't know when she was well off. Marry the bodyguard baby and then you'll find out what stupidity and hell in a doublewide with a guy who ONLY wants you for your dough really is, lol.
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 10:14AM
Janeyre said...
How do you know, what kind of husband she had?
10-29-2009 @ 12:59PM
pinGy RRRuLes said...
Actually, the guy she's allegedly having an affair with is an heir to the Pillsbury fortune.....
10-29-2009 @ 8:00AM
westdancers said...
her monthly expenses equal my pension I am supposed to live off of for the rest of my life. Anyone who pays into this by supporting their business is an idiot!
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 8:03AM
cambier lingua said...
And.... she's like these ugly older rich men who are so flattered when a beautiful young women "LOVES" them, lol. They are so laughable, chests puffed out trying to hide their big bellies and everyone laughs at them behind their backs. This Jamie isn't some beauty who would attract a younger bodyguard all on her own. She's rather unattractive and is immoral. It isn't the way to treat a famous guy who's literally given you everything. If you're unhappy, get the divorce, THEN fool around and do whatever.
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 11:53AM
JOANN said...
HOW DO YOU KNOW WHAT HE GAVE HER. MAYBE SHE IS THE BRAINS BEHIND THE OPERATION AND HE IS JUST A FRONT MAN. YOU DON'T KNOW WHAT GOES ON BEHIND CLOSED DOORS.
10-29-2009 @ 8:20AM
iamheredave1 said...
Hell I'll take her MONTHLY spousal support request for my YEARLY income. Just what in the heck do people need that kind of money for each month ?? Plus if she wants flowers, I think she can aford to pay for them herself!
Reply
10-29-2009 @ 8:21AM
Simpaticissima said...
Everyone high profile has an affair. Sooner or later it comes to light. And those who don't believe it are deluding themselves.
Reply